brain and speech picture

Past Splunch Talks


Tuesdays at 12 noon (Spring 2008)
The phonetics lab, 623 Williams Hall

You can find the upcoming schedule for splunch here.

Feb 12, 2008: Goldilocks meets the subset problem: Evaluating Error-Driven Constraint Demotion for OT language acquisition
Joshua Tauberer, University of Pennsylvania
[abstract]

Feb 5, 2008: The Acoustic- and Visual-Phonetic Basis of Place of Articulation in Excrescent Nasals
Laurel MacKenzie, University of Pennsylvania
[abstract]

Jan 29, 2008: Forced alignment as a tool and methodology for phonetics research
Jiahong Yuan, University of Pennsylvania
[abstract]

Jan 22, 2008: General Discussion

Dec 4, 2007: Ani Nenkova, University of Pennsylvania

Nov 27, 2007: Vowel Plots as a Diagnostic for the Nature of Loanword Integration in Montreal French
Michael Friesner, University of Pennsylvania
[abstract]

Nov 13, 2007: Learning word segmentation from acoustic data
Kyle Gorman, University of Pennsylvania
[abstract]

Nov 6, 2007: /k/ as as Sociolinguistic Variable Methodology and Results
Damien Hall, University of Pennsylvania
[abstract]

Oct 30, 2007: Pauses in Spontaneous Speech: Does syntactic context play a role?
Josh Tauberer, University of Pennsylvania
[abstract]

Oct 25, 2007:
Greg Kochanski, Oxford University (NB: this is a Thursday)

Oct 9, 2007: The effect of language shift on a sound change in progress
Maya Ravindranath, University of Pennsylvania
[pdf abstract]

Oct 2, 2007: NWAV practice talks
A shift of allegiance: The case of Erie and the North/Midland boundary
Keelan Evanini, University of Pennsylvania
[pdf abstract]

The spread of raising: opacity, lexicalization and diffusion
Josef Fruehwald, University of Pennsylvania
[pdf abstract]

Sept 27, 2007: Perception of Disfluency: Language Differences and Listener Bias
Catherine Lai, University of Pennsylvania
[paper]

Sept 20, 2007: Adaptive Training of Chinese Tones
Chilin Shih, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
[abstract]

April 12, 2007: Context and Learning in Multilingual Tone and Pitch Accent Recognition
Gina-Anne Levow, University of Chicago
[abstract]

April 5, 2007: The suprasegmental features of Amharic
Aviad Eilam, Department of Linguistics
[abstract]

March 29, 2007: Harmonic Grammar with linear programming
Christopher Potts, University of Massachusetts Amherst
[abstract]

Mar 22, 2007: The Trochaic Requirement On the interaction of prosody and syntax in the history of English with a few spotlights on German
Augustin Speyer, Department of Linguistics
[dissertation proposal]

Mar 15, 2007: Praat-Py
Joshua Tauberer, Department of Linguistics
[abstract]

Mar 1, 2007: American English dialect perception experiment
Keelan Evanini, Department of Linguistics
[abstract]

Feb 22, 2007: Dialectal and acoustic features of Vietnamese monopthongs
Giang Nguyen, Department of Linguistics
[abstract]

Feb 15, 2007: The Real Effect of Word Frequency on Phonetic Variation
Aaron Dinkin, Department of Linguistics
[abstract]

Feb 8, 2007: Phonological Variation in Multi-dialectal Italy
Christopher Cieri, Linguistic Data Consortium
[abstract]

Feb 1, 2007: A simpler view of Danish stød
Jonathan Gress-Wright
pdf abstract

Jan 25, 2007: Maybe tigers hibernate in Siberia
Josef Fruehwald

The phenomenon of Canadian Raising, as observed in Philadelphia and much of the northeastern United States, has typically been described as the centralization of the low up-gliding diphthong (ay) in pre-voiceless environments. However, some observations show that this categorical conditioning is breaking down. In my talk, I'll review some of the history of Canadian Raising and other similar phenomenon, and the motivations that have been put forward for the initial pre-voiceless conditioning. Then, I'll present the data I have collected so far, and my attempts at analyzing it. I also plan to fully embrace the informal nature of Splunch by making silly mistakes and not reading the entirety of the relevant literature

Jan 18, 2007: General discussion
("wedding vowels" and "bowels of holly")

Dec 7, 2006: Emerging Tonogenesis in Korean
Jonathan Wright

This thesis proposes that the conditions conducive to tonogenesis are present in modern Korean. The evidence centers on the aspirated and unaspirated voiceless stops (and affricates) and the loss of an aspiration distinction between them, with a tendency towards aspiration rather than a lack thereof. It's clear that for at least some Seoul speakers, there is no significant difference in VOT for these two obstruent series. The difference in pitch on vowels following these consonants, already noticed in the literature, seems the sole acoustic correlate maintaining the distinction. Aspirated stops have a high following pitch, unaspirated stops a low following pitch. Perception tests carried out by myself have confirmed the reliance on pitch as a cue. Recordings of Korean were modified such that the expected pitch, high or low, was reversed, and listeners then reversed their responses as expected. This state of affairs fits closely to one of the accepted causes of tonogenesis: the loss of voicing contrast between voiced and voiceless stops. For this dissertation, I plan to widen the scope of this inquiry. In terms of speakers, I hope to find the geographic and age distributions of the phonetic facts, through both further measurements and perception tests. In terms of phonetics, further relevant elements will be examined, including the acoustic correlates of other segments like the so-called tense stops, as well as prosodic/intonational patterns.

Nov 16, 2006: The Social and Linguistic Predictors of the Outcomes of Borrowing in the Speech Community of Montreal
Michael Friesner
pdf dissertation proposal

Nov 9, 2006: Phrasal tone domains in San Mateo Huave
Marjorie Pak

In the San Mateo dialect of Huave (isolate), utterances are divided into phrases that each have exactly one H pitch peak. While the tone- association rules provided in Noyer (1991) correctly predict where this 'phrasal H' tone will dock, how far it will spread, and whether it will be flanked by L tones, a number of questions remain open about *how utterances are parsed into tonal domains* in the first place. The current study addresses this question in more detail, drawing on a new corpus of 325 phrases elicited from 5 native speakers. I discuss two basic findings:

1. Generally, a verb forms a single tonal domain with *all* following arguments and modifiers, while preverbal subjects and adverbs phrase separately.

2. While Huave is generally understood to have basic (S)VO word order, VOS sentences were usually accepted and were sometimes produced spontaneously. Notably, the generalization in (1) holds across V(O)S sentences: *preverbal subjects form separate tonal domains, while postverbal subjects group together with the verb.* Furthermore, the same pattern is found with time/place adverbs that can appear on either side of the verb.

One possible explanation for this asymmetry, which I provisionally adopt, is that postverbal subjects and adverbs are in fact structurally closer to the verb than their preverbal counterparts, which have raised to a clause-peripheral position. I'll talk about some implications of this type of approach for future research on Huave syntax.

Upcoming Splunch talks.